The Disappeared

posted over 1 year ago by collisiontheory

1. 

   LiviuMatei said over 1 year ago

   nice. really effective. the guys at nodbod.com would go crazy with the print!

2. 

   Alex Norman said over 1 year ago

   wow this is amazing

3. 

   dylanmaker. said over 1 year ago

   really sick dude, i love this one.

4. 

   collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

   Thanks folks. Should i submit this somewhere?

5. 

   gaunty said over 1 year ago

   Genius!!

6. 

   heavyprints said over 1 year ago

   Looks awesome man!

7. 

   Johnny D said over 1 year ago

   Reminds me of a shower. I would wear this.

8. 

   dstreetz said over 1 year ago

   digging the hell out of it! creepy stuff...

9. 

   Godmachine said over 1 year ago

   i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit.

10. 

    vad_ns said over 1 year ago

    nice, very nice, i was thinking about some kind of design like this. love it !!!!

11. 

    explodingtoes said over 1 year ago

    i always love your designs but often wonder how they resolve around the back of the shirt

12. 

    a killer wombat said over 1 year ago

    godmachine said: i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit.

    Totally, red drips that are faint almost so that you get that mix of blood and water on the shower in a horror movie look.

    Then submit it somewhere so I can buy it... cause it will get picked.

13. 

    sockmonkee said over 1 year ago

    so amazing AJ

    love it

14. 

    Betraydan said over 1 year ago

    raddest idea yet , i love it

15. 

    xBulletx said over 1 year ago

    dope!

16. 

    Integral said over 1 year ago

    Love it like ym first blankie!
    I would see if EZ grabs it..

    Very cool concept.

17. 

    Nodbod3 said over 1 year ago

    Let me make this for you. Email me with your contact info. I have some ideas u may like.

18. 

    ChrisW said over 1 year ago

    thats cool. what on the back?

19. 

    dustinnance said over 1 year ago

    damn! When does this get printed?

20. 

    Setup85 said over 1 year ago

    sick idea

21. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    a killer wombat said:

    godmachine said: i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit.

    Totally, red drips that are faint almost so that you get that mix of blood and water on the shower in a horror movie look.

    Then submit it somewhere so I can buy it... cause it will get picked.

    yowza! added the blurrd as you guys suggested! not sure it could be printed this way though!

22. 

    warrenk said over 1 year ago

    That shit kills hard!

23. 

    payton1 said over 1 year ago

    Damn good idea!

24. 

    i came from nothing said over 1 year ago

    ez-kun said: nice. really effective. the guys at nodbod.com would go crazy with the print!

25. 

    NICOLO NIMOR said over 1 year ago

    killer! great!

26. 

    Nodbod3 said over 1 year ago

    email peter@nodbod.com and we will do this up for you as a concept piece very cool.

27. 

    Nodbod3 said over 1 year ago

    collsion we love this challange

28. 

    sht! said over 1 year ago

    this is fucking great!!!

29. 

    gianboy said over 1 year ago

    reminds me of
    

    still, nice execution.

30. 

    whyball said over 1 year ago

    really awesome!

31. 

    N.Guenzler said over 1 year ago

    I like it I just wish the red was coming from the hands, looks good though!

32. 

    The Quickness said over 1 year ago

    Man, I wish I could think like you.

33. 

    Wally Jones said over 1 year ago

    hey man, you have a brillant idea

    very nice

34. 

    heat. said over 1 year ago

    heythequickness said: Man, I wish I could think like you.

    I could, I had this idea a while, anyway nice job =)

35. 

    Survival said over 1 year ago

    looks great!

36. 

    iamthetrend said over 1 year ago

    love your style! keep up the great work!

37. 

    skzlr86 said over 1 year ago

    how would this be printed?

38. 

    Robb said over 1 year ago

    this should get tee of teh dayy :)

39. 

    jeff kardos said over 1 year ago

    this is so cool

40. 

    Alien8ed Clothing said over 1 year ago

    Very nice let me know when this goes on sale I have to have one.

41. 

    jfinley said over 1 year ago

    i like this a lot, creepy

42. 

    What The Eff said over 1 year ago

    i love this so much! i wish i could buy it....

43. 

    litoQ said over 1 year ago

    this is so great. DBH perhaps? kinda dark for them but this is sooo good

44. 

    electricpoutine said over 1 year ago

    reminds me of http://freelanceswitch.com/freelance-writing/working-in-the-shadows-ghostwriting-freelancing-and-work-without-recognition/
    

45. 

    electricpoutine said over 1 year ago

    ..just used some filters and colouring.

46. 

    kelly1 said over 1 year ago

    yes...filters for sure.

47. 

    AKUTOU said over 1 year ago

    i think there is a word for that... mmm oh yeah!! RIP OFF!

    wait no there is a better one!! OWNED!

    and LOL! too

48. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    electricpoutine said: reminds me of http://freelanceswitch.com/freelance-writing/working-in-the-shadows-ghostwriting-freelancing-and-work-without-recognition/

    Well like I said in the description on top it’s a CREATIVE COMMONS IMAGE i found. I just didn’t post the link.

    kelly1 said: yes...filters for sure.

    electricpoutine said: ..just used some filters and colouring.

    Well I can do whatever I want with it because I’m allowed to.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/piccadillywilson/212999782/sizes/l/in/set-72157594461850845/ Other people have used it for other designs/illustrations too.

    AKUTOU said: i think there is a word for that... mmm oh yeah!! RIP OFF! wait no there is a better one!! OWNED! and LOL! too

    Before you call me a RIP OFF you dickhead you better fuckin do your research first. It’s called CREATIVE COMMONS and it means I can do this to it:

    You are free:
    to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
    to Remix — to adapt the work

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    So there. Get over it.

49. 

    Keith. said over 1 year ago

    about time this got totd

50. 

    heavyprints said over 1 year ago

    Congrats AJ.

    lol@ the newbs trying to be all "pwnt"

51. 

    skull with hair said over 1 year ago

    looks great man.

52. 

    asher2789 said over 1 year ago

    dude - awesome.

    i love it. it reminds me of a photo i saw on deviantart, i cant remember the link or id link it to you. its obviously not the same photo, im not trying to rip on you (especially cause i can read and your image is CC)

53. 

    Tuism said over 1 year ago

    Wow amazing that something this long-standing got a TOTD. I wonder how the formulas work!

    Amazing work!!! Said so once, will say it again :)

54. 

    Evanimal said over 1 year ago

    Love it brother! Nice concept, perfect execution.

55. 

    kanzaki said over 1 year ago

    absolutely amazing!:O

56. 

    BennyBugatti said over 1 year ago

    brilliant, well deserved for tee of the day

57. 

    Mike Friedrich said over 1 year ago

    hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style.

    if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :)

    chEErs,
    mike

58. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

59. 

    ryanmiller said over 1 year ago

    always loved this man... well deserved on the totd

60. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

61. 

    destroyer said over 1 year ago

    first off this is gnarly.

    i dont know why ppl are buggin
    or ppl having to point out OMG
    LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE.
    this is rad who gives 2 fucks
    where the image came from or
    how complex the 'design' is
    he put his own spin on the piece.
    and it turned out sweet.

    =D

62. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    destroyer said: first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D

    I think you’d be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own.

63. 

    Josh Elowsky said over 1 year ago

    I’d double check the Creative Commons terms before selling this (rad has shit-all to do with it Destroyer) but as an exercise I wouldn’t sweat it.

64. 

    destroyer said over 1 year ago

    ppl have stolen my images
    and ive not sweat it.
    ppl are retarded and will do
    whatever it is they please
    despite what anyone else says.

    over it.
    lulz.

65. 

    artbysirb said over 1 year ago

    destroyer said: ppl have stolen my images and ive not sweat it. ppl are retarded and will do whatever it is they please despite what anyone else says. over it. lulz.

    agreed. who cares?

    pzn said:

    destroyer said: first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D

    I think you’d be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own.

    its a stock i believe, meaning you can do whatever you please with it.

    suck on that.

66. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

67. 

    jeremiah was a said over 1 year ago

    seems to be alot of fuckdoodles lurking the site recently. that being said, about time this got totd, love ittttttttttttt

68. 

    Tom Philibeck said over 1 year ago

    pzn said:

    destroyer said: first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D

    I think you’d be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own.

    do you have any idea what Creative Commons means?

    Good job, CT!! I really dig the design and I’m glad to see it got TOTD!!

69. 

    molasses4masses said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There’s a word for this....... PWNED!

    Apparently these people don’t know what they are talking about. Good job, duder!

70. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.

71. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.

    There’s no credit because this is not the final product. It’s a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass.

    "Stating the truth"?? You’re a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I’m not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn’t.

    Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

72. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.

    There’s no credit because this is not the final product. It’s a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass.

    "Stating the truth"?? You’re a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I’m not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn’t.

    Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

    Alright I’m gonna stop. I’ve had too much fun. I can’t believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it’s posted on the internet for everybody to read.

73. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.

    There’s no credit because this is not the final product. It’s a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass.

    "Stating the truth"?? You’re a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I’m not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn’t.

    Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

    Alright I’m gonna stop. I’ve had too much fun. I can’t believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it’s posted on the internet for everybody to read.

    Ha! The only rude person here was you.

74. 

    artbysirb said over 1 year ago

    i’ve got one thing to say after all this...

    it’s peanut butter jelly time, peanut butter jellay! peanut butter jellay!

    oh yeah, pzn, just quit already.

75. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    Mike Friedrich said: hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don’t follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike

    Haha you’re not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don’t know what they’re saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story.

    As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.

    I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he’s trying to tell you is that it’s kind of bogus because you’re trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it’s CreativeCommons, but it’s pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip.

    Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own.

    The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.

    Jesus there’s no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it’s for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it’s ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I’m sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn’t take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that’s the case.

    As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here’s what he said:

    "Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you’ve done with the pic.
    I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit.
    So, if I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'.

    Cheers
    Matt"

    So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.

    There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.

    There’s no credit because this is not the final product. It’s a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass.

    "Stating the truth"?? You’re a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I’m not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn’t.

    Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

    Alright I’m gonna stop. I’ve had too much fun. I can’t believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it’s posted on the internet for everybody to read.

    Ha! The only rude person here was you.

    What I’m trying to get at is that you’re SUPPOSE to credit the author of the picture no matter what you decide to do with the photo.

    You failed to credit them; that’s why I lashed out at you, because the base image is actually somebody else’s.

76. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said: Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

77. 

    jeff said over 1 year ago

    collisiontheory said:

    collisiontheory said: Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

    Anything you say is a futile attempt to dodge my point.

78. 

    collisiontheory said over 1 year ago

    pzn said:

    collisiontheory said:

    collisiontheory said: Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.

    Anything you say is a futile attempt to dodge my point.

    Noone’s dodging your point. What part of this didn’t you understand?:

    "..I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'."

    In the end, noone is stealing anything (which you baselessly accused me of). And credit will be given when and if the shirt will be produced (the final product)--which the original owner of the photo himself said.

    Anyway, all I’m saying is that before you accuse anyone of stealing/ripping please know the whole story.

79. 

    reppepp said over 1 year ago

    Yeah! you loose PZN! hahaha

    Btw, the shirt is pretty cool!

80. 

    Rial Demones said over 1 year ago

    real... cool concept bro.....

    vote.

81. 

    Ray Frenden said over 1 year ago

    I contact people who share creative commons photos to ask if I can reference them too. I usually just toss them up on the second monitor and use them as a visual aid. Nothing wrong with that. Or this tee.

82. Log In
    back